|
This article first appeared
as an LA Weekly cover story and in MAX magazine


A quarter century after the Sexual
Revolution made its big screen debut, HIV has
finally hit the porn industry hard. MARK CROMER
wonders if the party is finally over?
"Leave us alone and we will destroy ourselves."
-Bill
Margold, testifying to the Meese Commission, 1985
On the TV screen, sweating, entangled bodies heave and
thrust before a backdrop of blue tinsel. The cameras
bob and weave with no particular point and the lighting
shifts without warning as three or four women service
a parade of men. They approach in waves, looking for
an opening, some finding one, others waiting in line,
masturbating like pale human oil rigs. The women seem
barely interested; occasionally one will giggle. It's
rote copulation: one, two, three, next.
Now and then the director's voice
is heard in the background, giving instructions. "Put
a condom on" is not one of them.
This is Fluff Whores, one of two
videos made out of extra footage from The World's Biggest
Anal Gang Bang, shot earlier this year and released
a few months ago by Chatsworth-based Midnight Video.
The tape hit the X-rated racks just as the adult video
industry was hit by its most serious crisis since porn
entered the mainstream with Deep Throat.
Since January, five performers -
one male and four females - have tested positive for
HIV, the worst outbreak yet in the heterosexual side
of the industry. At least two of the infected performers
appear in Fluff Whores.
Brooke Ashley is one of them. The
25-year-old Asian-American believes it was on that shoot
that she was infected, during unprotected anal sex.
Marc Wallice, a veteran male performer who was one of
her partners, has also tested positive for the virus.
Production manager Randy Munee,
whose job it was to check the HIV-test results that
performers are supposed to bring with them to the set,
recalls that "the producer let Wallice work without
proper paperwork. Wallice had a Xerox so bad . . . it
looked like a Xerox of a Xerox. I told him that it didn't
fly with me." Munee also maintains he never saw
Ashley's test results at all.
"I was known as an anal girl.
I was a girl they called for D.P.'s [double penetration],"
says Ashley, who lives alone in a Los Angeles apartment.
(Her 7-year-old son lives with her father back home
in Kansas City.) Over the past six years, Ashley has
made lots of porn videos and lots of money - in one
month late last year, she estimates, she came close
to raking in $20,000. She spent it just as fast. "I
worked a lot and I did well for myself. But when you
make that kind of money, you don't think it's ever going
to end. I used coke and speed and I don't deny it, but
I never used needle drugs. Part of the hard part of
this business is dealing with how fast you are going.
You need to cope. You get depressed."
Brooke
Ashley: HIV +
|
Though she has required her partners
to wear condoms before, Ashley says that on Fluff Whores,
"I was going on faith that no one would shoot with
forged documents. I had known Marc for years, so I didn't
make him wear one. I was going on good faith."
The party is over for her, and she doesn't have much
to show for it. "This business has been a part
of my life for so long it's like a part of my family.
I was practically a kid when I got into this,"
she says, near tears. "But I never put anything
away on the side. I have no retirement, no savings.
Nothing."
That Midnight Video decided to release
Fluff Whores in the wake of the AIDS outbreak has her
seething.
"I can't believe they are releasing
this video," she says, noting that the company
duplicated and shipped the video after her test results,
and Wallice's, were known. "They know what I'm
going through, and they don't care."
"Yeah, I heard she's got AIDS
or something, or HIV, whatever," says Midnight
Video general manager Karl Sorvino, pointing out that
his company did not shoot the video, but merely acquired
it for sale. "It doesn't mean anything that she
has AIDS. Look, this chick took 50 guys in the ass in
one video! This is a surprise? If anyone was going to
get it, it was Brooke. Now she's raising a big stink,
but no one cares. The video was shot - of course it's
going to be released."
Cash Markman winces when he hears
these comments repeated - and, as director of Fluff
Whores and The World's Biggest Anal Gang Bang, perhaps
he should. A scriptwriter-turned-director who usually
works with bigger budgets and actual plots, he seems
slightly embarrassed about his participation.
"That's the only gangbang I've
done, and I am not trying to pass the buck, but I had
to do it," he says, sounding remarkably like a
man who's passing the buck. "I was obligated contractually."
The scene was the producer's idea, Markman swears. Though
the plan was to find 50 men to have anal sex with Ashley,
Markman estimates about 40 finally performed, and recalls
that Ashley did, in fact, ask some of the men to put
condoms on and declined to work with a few others -
who were promptly told to leave the set. (Ashley has
claimed that "it was in the contract that I could
only have half the guys wear condoms.")
"I don't think we had any internal
pop shots in that one," says Markman. "But
it's completely possible that she got HIV on the set.
The timing seems right. On the other hand, if you smoke
five packs of cigarettes a day for 10 years, can you
really pinpoint the day you got lung cancer?"
Markman says his bad feeling about
the shoot only grew worse when Munee told him some of
the men were presenting HIV test results that had been
photo-copied. "He told me [the producer] was going
to get into trouble," Markman recalls. "He
should have been demanding originals. I wanted to walk
off the set. I probably should have."
The rash of positive test results
has hit at a time when the industry is bigger than ever,
generating close to $3 billion in annual revenues and
employing thousands of people in and around Los Angeles,
up to 400 of them performers. (Adult Video News estimates
that last year 250 production companies released more
than 8,000 new X-rated video titles.) It also comes
at a time when porn is being creatively defined by the
work of a handful of rogue directors such as Paul Little,
a.k.a. Max Hardcore, and Rob Black, who produce some
of the most hard-edged, bizarre and unpleasant sex scenes
imaginable.
Porn
Sage William Margold
|
Fluff Whores is an example of the
plotless, budgetless and sexually heatless "one-day
wonder" video phenomenon that overtook the skin
industry in the late 1980s, an era when serious adult
filmmakers were poached almost out of existence by wannabes
armed with camcorders and a couple of grand to spend.
No longer aspiring to arouse the consumer with lush,
creatively explicit erotica, much of the porn produced
today is shock-oriented, a freak show - there are videos
that involve surgical tools, women taking on 50 or 100
or 300 men in "no holes barred" sequences.
All that's missing is the carnival barker inviting one
to "Step right up and get a closer look!"
Against this mad backdrop comes
the HIV outbreak, touching off a heated debate within
the industry. Some directors are calling for mandatory
condom use, others want it optional, and a few don't
want condoms at all. Most straight performers would
prefer to use condoms, as most gay performers already
do, but up until now, most of the production companies
have balked at letting the talent suit up before diving
in.
"Watching people use condoms
in porn is like watching the Raiders play touch football,"
remarks one industry insider. "It's not what people
want to see."
HIV has come remarkably late to
the heterosexual porn industry. Aside from the legendary
John Holmes, who was felled by pneumonia brought on
by AIDS in 1988, and John "Buttman" Stagliano,
who tested positive last year, there have until now
been only a few scattered cases of confirmed infections.
Holmes' widow, Laurie, who performed
in porn videos under the name Misty Dawn, says she saw
the writing on the wall a long time ago, as her husband
lay dying in his Sepulveda hospital bed. "I tried
to warn everyone and they wouldn't listen," she
says. "They were trying to say AIDS wasn't in the
industry, and I'm like, 'No, no, no!' They kept saying
John contracted the virus outside of the industry, that
he was a junkie and he was gay and all this stuff that
simply wasn't true. They were just lies to protect the
industry."
The current crisis, which sparked
an industry quarantine of dozens of L.A. performers,
has strained an already tumultuous business. With each
new positive test result, meetings are held between
producers, directors and performers, where strategy
is discussed and, more often than not, fingers are pointed.
Everyone seems to be on the record in favor of "protecting
the talent," yet consensus on just how to accomplish
that task in this small, tight-knit business has yet
to be reached.
Two main camps have emerged: those
companies and directors who are willing to let performers
use condoms - now seemingly in the majority - and those
companies and directors who opt to rely instead on the
most advanced virus-testing procedures, plus "personal
responsibility." Not surprisingly, the divide is
somewhat along class lines, with the better-established,
more "respectable" companies declaring unequivocally
for condoms. And while big-name contract stars have
some say in what kind of sex they have and with whom,
the lower ranks are filled with newcomers willing to
do whatever they're asked in order to get inside. At
the same time, says Mark Kulkis, former director of
public relations for the Chatsworth-based Legend Video,
"Some of these bigger companies are using scare
tactics on the talent, telling them they won't hire
them at all if they work in videos without a condom."
Jeff Steward, Legend's general manager,
is one of the more vocal critics of mandatory condom
use in adult videos. "The companies that are going
condom-only are doing it for the wrong reasons. They
are just trying to be P.C. And it won't work anyway,
because they'll do a sex scene, pull the condom off
and then come in the woman's mouth. Or they come in
a glass and have her drink it. How's that safe sex?"
Bud Lee, a veteran porn director
who frequently shoots big-budget productions for Playboy
and other large adult-entertainment companies, contends
that "if you make a hot product with beautiful,
great sex, people won't give a damn whether or not there's
a condom in it. It's when you make a shit production
for $15,000, shot in one day by a clueless director
and a set manager who couldn't stage a dog fight, that
you have to use the excuse of being filthier and nastier
in order to sell your product."
Legend's Steward would seem to agree:
"If you look at our titles, if you cut out the
sex, you're left with about five minutes of nothing,"
he says, but adds, "Look, if I rent a porn video,
I don't want to see condoms. Porn is fantasyland. Who
wants porn that is politically correct? A movie that
relies on sex will sink with a condom."
"We owe it to the public to
stop the ruse that [porn] is just fantasy," counters
Lee. "Gays don't see unprotected sex as fantasy,
they see it as watching death on the screen."
The wild cards in the controversy
remain directors like Paul Little and Rob Black, who
have never been much for marching to a party line, or
indeed getting anywhere near it. A 40-year-old former
UPI photographer, Little came to L.A. in the early 1990s
to produce videos that represent the very antithesis
of safe sex: In one signature scene, the director himself
ejaculates into the anus of his partner, who then pushes
the semen back out into another woman's open mouth.
"What I think constitutes good
porno can simply be put like this: Porn should be a
little over the top," he explains, slouching behind
a large desk in his office at the Chateau du Max, his
three-story, 5,600-square-foot mansion in the foothills
of Altadena. "My philosophy is that it's not that
shocking or newsworthy that a girl dressed like a whore
lets you fuck her up the ass. Good porno is when you
have a girl in the picture who looks sexy but innocent.
When a little girl like that takes it up the ass, now
that's a story! That a has compelling human interest
to it!"
To be sure, as the sole male in
most of his tapes, Little also puts himself at risk,
though given the statistics of female-to-male transmission
of HIV, at considerably less risk than his sex partners.
He remains ambivalent as to what he will do now. In
the course of an interview, he indicates at one point
that he's going to begin using condoms, then says he
doesn't want to make any "rash decisions,"
preferring to "take it on a case-by-case basis."
He notes that he usually works with "fresh girls"
with whom he feels safer having sex than with veteran
actresses who have been "used up."
Still, he admits, "It's never
going to be business as usual again. Them days are over.
People are starting to fall like bowling pins, if you'll
pardon the analogy, so people are really taking it seriously
now. As far as how it's going to change the industry,
it's going to have a profound impact. Though not so
much that the consumer is really going to notice. There
is still going to be the same activity going on in the
tapes, with the exception that condoms are going to
be used in quite a few videos. And I think that is good,
because it helps set the tone for people watching the
videos."
In the Sherman Oaks offices of Protecting
Adult Welfare (PAW), a sort of XXX crisis center just
down the hall from Jim South's World Modeling Talent
Agency - the very center of San Fernando Valley smut
- former porn star Sharon Mitchell (Joy, The Load Warriors)
greets many of the performers who come in by their real
first names, giving them hugs and pecks on the cheek
as if they were visiting family. And in a way, this
is her family - however dysfunctional it might be.
Veteran
perforner Sharon Mitchell
|
Known among skin-flick fans for
her wiry frame and New York City streetwise sexuality,
Mitchell, 46, quit performing for a stint behind the
camera, then finally left the business after a "crazy
fan" tried to kill her. Now clean and sober after
a 16-year addiction to heroin, Mitchell continues to
work closely with the adult industry. Certified by the
California Association of Drug and Alcohol Educators,
she is the in-house counselor for the PAW-created Adult
Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation (AIM). While
she clearly sees the dark side of the business, she
has made her peace with porn and her past.
"I won't turn my back on the
industry. That's where I came from. It no longer works
for me, but it does work for others," Mitchell
explains. "Truthfully, I might have just said,
'Fuck it.' I mean, I had a lot of core issues with this
business, but I really couldn't do it. There are so
many other women and men who need to know the life experience
I've had here, and that's what I bring to this office."
While she may seem at times more
big sister than professional therapist, she has tracked
the progress of HIV in porn first-hand. When performer
Tricia Devereaux first tested positive in January, it
was Mitchell who charted the genealogy of her sexual
relations in an effort to stem the spread of the virus.
Using Devereaux's day journal, which identified every
performer she had worked with and when, Mitchell cross-indexed
that information with the industry's records on test
results. Performers who might have been exposed to the
virus were quickly placed on an industry quarantine,
and anyone who had not cleared a PCR (polymerase chain
reaction) DNA test, the most accurate test currently
available, was required by PAW to test negative twice
in order to be cleared for work again.
"With Tricia's genealogy, I
started with about 75 people who may have been exposed,"
Mitchell says, recalling how she and Bill Margold -
a former porn agent, current director, sometime performer
and, as the self-styled "St. Francis of Assisi
of X," the founder of PAW - burned the midnight
oil, poring over records and working the phones. "We
went one by one. We looked for everyone who'd DNA'd
out. Who had current test results and who didn't? And
everyone was considered high risk, whether or not they
wore a condom.
"By the second generation of
the genealogy, we were dealing with such a scare, because
we were dealing with multiple partners over a period
of time, when [Devereaux] was only using the ELISA test,"
Mitchell says. (The ELISA, or enzyme-linked immunosuppresent
assay, is considered less accurate than the PCR test
because it tests only for antibodies to the virus, which
can take up to six months to develop.) "I had to
contact relatives, loved ones and pregnant mothers in
an effort to get them in here and get them to take DNA
tests." She felt something like a Western Union
messenger delivering death notices during World War
II.
Yet if Mitchell and Margold thought
they would receive substantial assistance from the industry,
they were wrong. "We did not have help from the
manufacturers," Mitchell says. "It was pretty
much the talent who came forward and helped us with
the genealogy. The manufacturers don't like to know
the reality that Bill and I bring to the world. Their
attitude was 'Fix it! Do whatever you have to do, but
just fix it!'"
Their experience on the Devereaux
case, tracing the potential path of the virus, meant
that when Brooke Ashley tested positive, they were able
to more quickly establish the dimensions of the quarantine.
In porn, the rules of confidentiality that traditionally
govern how medical professionals and counselors handle
test results don't apply, can't apply. "In this
industry, if you have been exposed to the virus, the
rules get turned upside down. We do what we have to
do to save lives," Mitchell says. "If someone
has been exposed and they are on a set, I have to call
over there and say, 'Excuse me, this is Mitch. Can I
speak with so and so?' In one instance, I made enough
phone calls that four or five sets were shut down across
the Southland in one day. We have to do it that way,
and people understand."
Each time it began to seem as if
the virus might have been contained, and that it was
safe for performers to venture back under the bright
lights, another performer tested positive: Devereaux
in January, Brooke Ashley in March, a Hungarian performer
named Caroline in April, Marc Wallice later that month,
Kimberly Jade in May. A sixth performer, initially identified
by AIM as positive, has since tested negative elsewhere
and been cleared to return to work.
The potential for HIV to cut a deadly
swath through the industry's small pool of talent was
instantly clear. In a matter of months, the virus had
come close to doing to porn what its opponents had long
failed to do: put it out of business. "If it continues
to spread in the business," says Ashley, "this
will give the government the perfect opportunity to
step in and say, 'Enough is enough,' and either shut
the industry down as a health hazard or seriously regulate
it." At one point this spring, most of the performers
in town were under orders not to work - at least until
their tests came back clean.
Marc Wallice, whose 17-year body
of work includes Anal Savage, Anal Anarchy and The Creasemaster,
among more than a thousand other films and videos, has
become the target of accusations that he is "patient
zero" - the performer who brought the virus into
the business. He says his PCR test results were disclosed
to him in late April during a conference call with Sharon
Mitchell and several others. This week, in a telephone
interview, Wallice alternately raged against his accusers
and whispered his devotion to the industry.
"I was trying to hang on, and
all of a sudden I started hearing these wild things
- that I was using needles, that I was doing gay outcall,
that I had known I was HIV positive for years,"
he says. "What about all the directors who are
fucking the girls in the bathrooms on the set? Where
are their tests? There are so many holes in this case."
Wallice contends that there was
no problem with the test result he provided on the set
of Fluff Whores. "I gave the P.A. my original,
he made a photocopy of it and gave it back to me. I
showed him the original. I always had original tests
on the sets. If I did have a fake test, where is it?
Show it to me."
As to his possible infection from
intravenous drug use, he says he only briefly experimented
with needles years ago. "I was hanging out with
a couple of other female performers, and they were shooting
junk. I was smoking coke, but I dabbled in it a little
with them."
Shortly after Mitchell announced
his HIV status at an April 30 industry meeting, Wallice
dropped out of sight. For three weeks, he shuttled between
three motels, scoring and smoking coke - to the tune
of about $2,000 a week. "In the back of my mind
I was probably hoping I would just pass out and not
wake up," he says. "Not because I am guilty
of anything, but because I wanted the pain to stop."
He was eventually sketching on coke
with two women he had met at one of the motels and -
in the paranoid belief that they were setting him up
for a robbery - had the desk clerk call the cops. Wallice
was immediately busted for possession of cocaine. "I
was tweaked. My brain was gone. It's all sort of a blur
now."
Looking back over his career, Wallice
is stunned by the wreckage.
"I was at the top of my game.
I was finally doing what I had dreamed of doing, which
was to be making movies instead of just performing in
them," he says, his voice starting to crack. "Now
I have gone from making $6,000 a month to getting $500
a month from unemployment. Thank God I have a mother
who loves me."
Sharon Mitchell and Bill Margold
reject any assertion that Wallice - or any other performer
- can be defined as "patient zero." "Remember,
Marc worked with Tricia [Devereaux], and he could have
gotten it from her," says Mitchell. "People
keep telling me it's unlikely she gave it to him, but
goddamn it, we don't know." The likelihood of ever
knowing for certain is slim, she continues, because
it's difficult to get the whole truth out of people
about their private lives - even porn stars. "I
can tell you, as a counselor, that people come in here
and disclose information to us bit by bit," she
says. "But really, no one tells us everything.
There's still a lot of denial."
Ferd Eggan, AIDS coordinator for
the city of Los Angeles - who during the '70s was himself
directing porn films with titles such as Straight Banana
- agrees that it's difficult, as a result of their usually
chaotic private lives, to trace the source of transmission
among porn stars. "To rely simply on testing, even
if it is PCR DNA, is to allow your performers to be
infected," he says. Though he is the city's point
man on the disease, Eggan says the industry has not
called him about the recent outbreak. "Oddly enough,
they don't consult with me on these matters."
Indeed, what has most characterized
the industry's response to the threat of AIDS is its
determination to deal with the situation - or not deal
with it - within the "family." This becomes
clear back at the PAW office, when porn talent agent
Jim South wanders into a room where Margold is talking
with a reporter.
"You're talking with a reporter
about AIDS in the industry?" he asks incredulously.
"And you think this will help?"
"We can't deny that it's happening,"
Margold replies. "That definitely won't help."
"Sure," South says, and
stomps out of the room.
Margold looks at the reporter. "There's
a lot of disagreement about this issue."
For a man who has spent three decades
enthusiastically preaching and practicing what he likes
to call the "Gospel of X," Margold now seems
oddly weary. Drained. The band may be playing on, but
the tune now seems to be "Taps."
"Finally, after all these years,
I realize that recess is over in the playpen of the
damned," he says, repeating what has now become
his catch phrase. "We either have to accept our
responsibility or we are finished."
Max
& Me: Cromer & Hardcore, circa 1995
|
top
|